What happened
The Council on Foreign Relations surveyed 350 foreign policy experts on how frontier AI capability distribution and governance structures will shape global order by 2035. Headline finding: "more than 80 percent of respondents expect that AI governance will be fragmented," with only 5% expecting domestic institutions to keep pace with AI development. Experts split nearly evenly on capability concentration (46% expect continued concentration among a few actors vs. 54% expecting diffusion to dozens of state/non-state actors), and nearly 70% believe frontier AI labs will be the most powerful non-state actors by 2035, with 75% expecting non-state actors to gain leverage over states. More than 70% see a serious AI accident as the most likely trigger for governance change.
Why it matters
Quantifies elite consensus that no institution — national or multilateral — is currently positioned to govern frontier AI, directly informing how boards and policy teams should weight regulatory-capture and fragmentation risk in long-range AI strategy.
Action needed
Incorporate the fragmentation/power-shift findings into enterprise geopolitical risk scenarios and long-range AI governance planning.